European Union Global Warming
Posted in EU Info on 10/06/2010 11:23 pm by admin
Why is US reducing emissions bettewr than the EU when the EU signed the Kyoto BS protocol?
in 2006, total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions fell 1.5 percent — and the intensity of those gases fell 4.2 percent — without an international pact.
By contrast, the European Union, which is loudly proud of signing on to the Kyoto Protocol, increased greenhouse gas emissions 0.4 percent.
The decrease in U.S. emissions is attributed to a greater use of natural gas in electricity production, declines in agricultural and industrial methane output and better land-use and forestry practices, among other things.
That’s some good news and might have started the conferees thinking about the effectiveness of voluntary, market-based solutions to global warming.
You use “cherry picking” meaning you take the data from a single year, the one which fits your views.
Let me just give you much more figures:
—————————————–
emissions per capita:
US: 19t CO2
EU: 9t CO2
GDP per CO2 emitted:
US: $1,936/tCO2
EU: $4,200/tCO2
FYI: Sweden : $6591/tCO2
As such the CO2 intensity in the US is SO high that the decrease is the result to a simple adjustment to the increased energy prices on international markets
————————————————————————-
Absolute evolution of emissions compared to the 1990 baseline:
countries not trying to reach a Kyoto target saw their emisssions grow:
US: +16% Canada: +30%
EU countries: -0.8 (-8% target for 2012)
—————————————————
The market approach
If you want a “voluntary market based solution” what you are imagining is a “voluntary tax or fee to pay” (I want the same for my taxes). Any serious economist will tell you that a price for CO2 can´t exist without a cap in emissions, just like money has a value because there is a limited quantity of it corresponding to a limited quantity of wealth you can exchange it to.
EU’s Hedegaard: Fear to fail led to deal at COP16 in Cancun, Mexico (raw video)
|
|
CBS News Presents: Global Warming $12.99 This compilation, containing 10 segments from 60 Minutes and the CBS Evening News Archives, begins by chronicling the research, new discoveries, and political implications of the Global Warming question. The stories date from January 2001 to June 2002. The compilation concludes with a 60 Minutes segment from 2006, “Rewriting the Science”, which questions the Bush Administration’s handling of the G… |
|
|
Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading $13.06 Over the past decade, carbon trading has emerged as the industrialized world’s primary policy response to global climate change despite considerable controversy. With carbon markets worth $144 billion in 2009, carbon trading represents the largest manifestation of the trend toward market-based environmental governance. In Carbon C… |
|
|
Pricing Carbon $47.00 The European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is the world’s largest market for carbon and the most significant multinational initiative ever taken to mobilize markets to protect the environment. It will be an important influence on the development and implementation of trading schemes in the US, Japan, and elsewhere. However, as is true of any pioneering public policy experiment, this sc… |
|
|
Eu Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives (New Horizons in Environmental Law Series) $126.69 This book explores the current policy measures adopted by the EU in order to realize its Kyoto Protocol commitment and to prepare for further emission reductions after 2012. “EU Climate Change Policy” focuses on legal instruments, with emissions trading at the forefront of the policy package, accompanied by directives on energy taxation, energy efficiency and renewable energy. Distinguished author… |